It's as though George Bailey was able to go back in time, Inception-like, and place a hidden camera in the offices of Old Man Potter and then get to play his misdeeds back for everyone to see. You can probably hear the citizens of Bedford Falls now, 'why you lying sack ....'
The Florida Marlins lost their best defense against the accusation of profitability yesterday when the web site Deadspin produced financial statements involving four major league teams, including the Marlins. Previously, despite absurdly low payrolls, team valuations which were consistent with Forbes analysis and the complaints of revenue sharing payee teams, Jeffrey Loria, through David Samson, would deflect criticism of their pocketing revenue sharing monies by asking if anyone could produce financial statements which would substantiate the claims of the Marlins profitability. Today the answer is yes.
I was most interested in how the Deadspin financials compared to the previous Forbes reporting. Here are the highlights [numbers in millions]:
- Operating Profits for the years 2008 and 2009 combined - $90 million according to both Forbes and the Deadspin - no difference
- 2009 Revenues - Forbes higher by 8
- 2009 Expenses - Forbes lower by 1
- 2008 Revenues - no difference
- 2008 Expenses - Forbes higher by 9
- Ownership Payments [account reads Administration -- about $10 million each year by the way -- hey you thought Loria watched the games for free?]
- Management Fee - Related Party
- [New] Ballpark Expenditures

In an attempt to deflect the bad news and ensure their fans that this proof of their lack of veracity would not change how they do business, the Marlins released one of their more popular players, Cody Ross.
2 comments:
I can't say exactly what the Administration expense line item represents. I'm speculating that it may not be a legitimate operating expenses for 2 reasons:
1) If it were a non-operating expense, that would be consistent with the Forbes numbers
2) The vague description [Administrative expenses were noted elsewhere] makes me wonder if it is purposely vague
BTW, heard that Forbes would be weighing in soon as to how their numbers compare with the released financials.
Great blog... I thank you for shedding some light on this. It's interesting although maybe a tad above my head.
Post a Comment